Internet Explorer VML Vulnerability

Looks like there’s yet *another* IE vulnerability on the loose. This particular vulnerability uses a bug in VML (Vector Markup Language) to cause a buffer overflow and allow the attacker to gain access to the system. I’m a little late to the scene, but this was initially reported on September 18th. But FEAR NOT! Microsoft has happily released a security advisory in which they explain that they know about the vulnerability, and that they’ll release a patch on October 10th.





Umm.. October 10th? That’s almost a month *AFTER* the report was made public.. This happens to be a really nasty bug that can cause your computer to be completely compromised and they admit to knowing about code in the wild exploiting this bug!

The person who reported this was not being irresponsible and revealing a “potential” security issue the the hacker community. Quite the opposite, in fact, they were reporting a known in-the-wild exploit with the intention of informing the masses so they could act accordingly. For Microsoft to not release a patch quicker, or even publish some viable mitigation strategy is incredibly irresponsible. At the very least they could explain how to unregister the VGX.DLL file that is the source of the expoit. Luckily, Sunbelt has instructions on how to do this.

If you’re interested in a better solution, ZERT (Zeroday Emergency Response Team) has created a patch to fix the problem. Be aware that this is not sanctioned by Microsoft and is supplied As-Is. However, if you rely on IE and want a reasonable sense of security, this may be your only choice until the behemoth from Redmond decides to release an “official” patch.

My recommendation? Switch to something else. There’s Firefox (my personal choice), Opera, and others. IE just has too many problems.


If you’d like to read more about this vulnerability, check out these links :


SunbeltBLOG – These are the guys that first reported the problem

TaoSecurity – A report about ZERT and how they’re proving that the closed source security model is broken

eWeek – A report about the vulnerability and the patch that ZERT created


I also want to point out that I’m not necessarily anti-Microsoft. I believe they’ve helped out the computer industry in many ways. However, I dislike many of their practices, and this is definitely one of them. It’s important for any software developer to release security patches when necessary. It is of utmost importance for a closed-source developer to release security patches as fast as possible because they’re the only ones who can truly patch the hole. Open source allows anyone, with the necessary skills, to patch the hole. I’m not saying Microsoft should open-source Windows, but maybe they should work a little harder to put together patches with more speed.

The Patchwork OS

Twelve patches, Twenty Three vulnerabilities.

Tuesday was Microsoft Patch day. Of the twelve patches, nine were for the Windows OS, two for Office, and one for Internet Explorer. A breakdown of the severity of each patch can be found on the ISC Website.


I mention this because of the severity of these flaws. There is already an exploit in the wild taking advantage of MS06-040, a flaw in the Server service. This is yet another flaw in the RPC functionality of Windows. Ports 139/tcp and 445/tcp are again the attack vector used to exploit this. For those that remember the past few years, these ports are notorious for being used as vectors to exploit the RPC service. Most commonly associated with Netbios, these are probably the most blocked ports on the Internet.

In addition to the above gem, there are also vulnerabilities in DNS resolution, the Windows Management Console, and more. You can find more information on all of these exploits at the link mentioned above. I highly recommend patching your system ASAP since exploits are in the wild and this could easily turn into another Blaster style attack. Even the Department of Homeland Security is recommending that you patch immediately. According to some reports, Microsoft is already bracing for an attack.


I find the frequency and number of exploitable bugs in the Windows OS to be disturbing. Linux and OSX have bugs, but nothing as frequent as Windows seems to have. A lot of the reports that compare the various operating systems seems to miss the fact that Windows as an OS (minus any Office or IE patches) has a higher number of critical exploits as compared to Linux or OSX. Often the exploits of other packages such as apache, ftp, etc are lumped in with the Linux count and assumed to be part of the OS. While most Linux distros ship with much more than the Linux Kernel itself, it’s unfair to count those exploits as part of the whole. Other reports seem to realize these facts and produce results much closer to the truth.

I think, however, that Microsoft has helped the computer industry. They helped popularize the personal computer and provided much of the software for the initial PC boom. They have invested billions of dollars into creating their products and bringing them to market. But, I think it’s high time for them to make some major changes. I would like to see them embrace the Open Source community and learn how to build and market open source products. If they embraced the Linux OS and helped extend it instead of fighting against it, I think the computer industry could take another giant leap forward. They can certainly continue to create and sell the various applications they currently have, and even produce new ones. The very act of running their apps on a Linux system may help to enhance security across the entire industry. Linux itself has proven to be very resilient to attack.

One of the biggest myths about Linux seems to be the belief that all software running on a Linux system has to be open source. Nothing could be further from the truth, however. It is certainly acceptable to run closed source products on an open source OS provided that you play within the rules. I’m not 100% clear on all of the ramifications of the GPL license, but as I understand it, you are permitted to modify any OSS product out there provided you make the source available. But, I believe you are permitted to build closed source apps using OSS libraries and not distribute the source *if* you use unaltered versions of the libraries. I may be wrong here, so please correct me if I am. Regardless, the ability to write closed source programs that run on an OSS platform definitely exists.


Whois Query Fun


I ran across a really neat way to use the whois tool in Linux the other day. There is apparently a lot more information available than I knew about! Check out the full article for more.

Basically, in addition to the normal owner/tech contact data that you can get from the standard whois servers, and the IP block assignment information you can get from ARIN, there’s also some additional IP information you can get from Cymru. Specifically, you can run queries against ‘’ to determine what ISP hosts/owns the netblock. Check it out :

[user@localhost ~]$ whois -h

AS | IP | AS Name

33241 | | EMCS-AS – Endless Mountain Cyb

In addition to that, you can also check another server, ‘’ to check for upstream peers. Extremely useful for determining how “connected” a provider is when you’re looking for new service. Or, for determining what providers you need to talk to for help in blocking possible attacks. Check it out :

[user@localhost ~]$ whois -h

PEER_AS | IP | AS Name
3593 | | EPIX – EPIX
3737 | | PTD-AS – PenTeleData Inc.

Overall, I find this to be quite useful and I’ll definitely be using it! I hope you find it just as useful…